http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2003/aug/25/prov/20030825pro6.html
Monday, August 25, 2003
Group hits Batangas port project
By Moneth Deposa, Researcher
BATANGAS CITY- Controversy has seeped into the construction of the Batangas Port Livelihood Center (BPLC) in Barangay Sta. Clara, with a group involving former governor J. Antonio Leviste opposing the project.
In a letter to Alfonso Cusi, Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) general manager, dated July 30, the Batangas Port Planners and Dev-elopers Inc. (BPPDI) said construction of the center overlaps an existing reclamation project.
BPPDI General Manager Rio Espiritu said the group questioned the
approval and implementation of the lease contract between the PPA and the provincial government of Batangas covering the center.
Espiritu warned that the provincial government risks being hauled to court if it goes ahead with the project.
The center is a flagship project of the Batangas government with
funding from the Land Bank of the Philippines.
To be built inside the Port of Batangas, the center would have
commercial stalls, recreational facilities, restaurants, movie houses and bars.
Groundbreaking for the project was held on July 28.
Espiritu said the lease contract was signed despite the existence of a prior contract between the Philippine Estates Authority (PEA) and the BPPDI on the same land in 1993.
Based on the documents obtained by The Manila Times, the 1993 contract included a reclamation project in Batangas City as part of the PPA Batangas International Sea Port.
The reclamation project covers 96 hectares bounded on the north by the Batangas Port, on the south by Batangas Bay, Marjuya River on the east and Sta. Clara Elementary School on the west.
Eventually renamed the Batangas Port Reclamation Project, it was meant to provide the port with a back-up area reserved for private commerce and industry.
The BPPDI was supposed take over the project in exchange for a
60-percent share of the reclaimed land.
Espiritu said BPPDI¡Çs contract with PEA was still ¡Èvalid,
subsisting, binding and legal¡É because it is protected by Presidential Decree 1084 dated February 4, 1997 signed by President Fidel V. Ramos empowering the PEA to reclaim land, and Executive Order 525 dated February 14, 1999, naming PEA as the agency responsible for all reclamation projects for and on behalf of the national government.
EO 525 also mandates that all reclamation projects shall be approved by the President upon recommendation by the PEA or through a contract with any person or entity.
Based on its mandates, the PEA signed a contract with the BPPDI for the reclamation project.
The BPPDI lists as incorporators Sen. Loren Legarda-Leviste, Teodorico Diesmos, Felipe Cruz, Angelita Cruz, Eric Cruz, Ricardo Roqueza and Leviste as president.
After BPPDI¡Çs memorandum of agreement with PEA was signed, a
representative from the PPA, Carlos L. Agustin signed the contract.
The PPA ¡Ècannot now deny the existence or oppose the subject matter of the contract between PEA and BPPDI in view of its active participation and obvious acquiescence in the said contract,¡É Espiritu said.
He said the PPA is now in estoppel and its violation would give rise to an action for damages.
Espiritu strongly urged the PPA, the Batangas government and the Land Bank of the Philippines to put the center project on hold and called for the creation of a technical committee to review the contract.
¡ÈInasmuch as it has been noted that the privity of contract is
between Public Estates Authority and Batangas Port Planners and Development Inc. and more significantly, their agreement covers reclaimed areas contiguous to the seaport project, it still bears stressing that no categorical mention was made in query on the matter regarding the area covered by EO No. 302. In this regard, it might be possible that while the project may be contiguous, there might be an overlapping on the area covered
by the lease contract,¡É he said.
Espiritu proposed the creation of a committee of lawyers and technical people from BPPDI, PEA, PPA and the provincial government to conduct a ground survey, come up with survey plan, technical description and other documents to clear up the issue.
He warned that if Memorandum Order 302 is ignored, both PPA and the provincial government would violate Article 7 of the Civil Code which states: ¡ÈLaws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or nonobservance shall not be excused by disuse, or custom or practice to the contrary.¡É
The Times also learned that Leviste, who is president of BPPDI, is also member of the PPA Board of Directors.
¡ÈA mere conflict of interest,¡É according to a text message sent to The Times by Arnold Gutierrez, executive assistant of the provincial government on special projects.
Gutierrez said the BPPDI does not have any right to oppose the project because it ¡Èdid not reclaim any land of the port.¡É
He said the livelihood center would push through as scheduled because not only for the residents of Sta. Clara but the entire province stand to benefit from it.
|